| To Home Page | Crown Molding | Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Spreadsheets |
Vaulted or cathedral ceilings offer a real challenge for those of you who want to install crown molding. Read this section first !!!!
Click to the right for the section you are interested in: |
Basics of Vaulted Ceilings |
|---|
1. Basics of Crown Molding on Vaulted Ceilings: Putting crown molding in corners that involve vaulted ceilings requires considerable insight and careful planning. It should be tackled only by someone who is familiar with putting up crown on regular flat ceilings! I don’t profess to be an expert in this area, but I have done some experimenting that I want to share with you. Don’t be discouraged but be aware of some of the following problems:
To be sure, some of these problems can be resolved with some of the following ideas. However, keep these limitations in mind when you are considering your project. And if you don't understand the first and second comments, read on. Let's try an experiment: Visualize putting a 2x4 along a wall that intersects with a ceiling that slopes upwards. The top of the 2x4 rests against the wall/ceiling corner, and there is a gap between the ceiling and this "molding". To eliminate the gap, you rip the 2x4 at an angle that corresponds to the vault angle. Now it fits snugly to the ceiling but is higher on the wall. This same wall makes a 90° turn and you put a 2x4 against the sloping ceiling. You don’t need to rip this board; it fits fine. But where the two meet in the corner, you have a mismatch! You need to either trim the sloping 2x4 or cut and insert a triangular piece as shown with the dotted line below. |
|---|
![]() |
|---|
Now look at other wall-to-ceiling intersections (such as a beam along a sloping ceiling) and see how a simple board can create gaps and/or mismatches. It should be quite clear that to solve this mismatch becomes more complex when you substitute crown molding for the flat board! |
|---|
| To top of the page |
|---|
2. Intersections: Intersections of vertical walls and sloping ceilings come in several
different configurations. Let's take a closer look and try to classify them in
more detail. |
|---|
![]() |
|---|
See photo above:
Next series:
See photo below: This is an example of an alcove with a flat ceiling that joins a vaulted ceiling. The intersection to the left is an inside corner (wall angle equals 135°). It is a type C-2 intersection. To the right is a type C-3 (wall angle greater than 180°). |
|---|
![]() |
|---|
Note that the list is by no means complete. We can add more as the occasion arises. However, this outline should help to identifying the more common corner joints you will encounter. When you prepare a plan view of the project record these intersections and think about how to tackle them during the design stages. Again, you will find that each of these different intersections require a new approach. |
|---|
Vault Angle We need to define one more parameter: the vault angle q. This is the angle the ceiling makes with a horizontal line. It should be determined at several locations using the wall angle gauge, for instance, and averaged. Make the measurement from wall to ceiling and subtract 90º. |
|---|
![]() |
|---|
In addition to q, the length along the vaulted ceiling needs to be measured. Of course, in this case it is not the plan view dimension, but the actual length of the intersection of wall and ceiling. You will also find that for most intersections you may need to make measurements along the wall. I explained this in Part 1, but let me repeat the sketch to show you. It is an important point. |
|---|
![]() |
|---|
| To top of the page |
|---|
3. Resolving the Dilemma of Vaulted Ceiling Intersections: Intersections of vertical walls and sloping ceilings come in several
different configurations. Let's take a closer look and try to classify them in
more detail. The dilemma I refer to is that when the same crown molding comes together from two different directions and with different angles from the horizontal, the parts will not match. Something has to be done to make the joint smooth and uniform. To be sure, ceilings with a very small vault angle can be treated with lots of caulk and "popcorn" type of ceiling finishes. There is a book on the market that shows just that. I doubt, however, that you will find many ceilings with a 20° angle and the old fashion popcorn finish. On the following pages you will see my models where the angle is 30º and the only "filler" was paint to make contrast for the photographs. |
|---|
I present you with four methods that can be considered. They all have their limitations and problems, but I leave it up to you to choose which is best for your installation and skill levels.
Each of these methods has a sub category (case) that depends on the type of intersection. I will concentrate on Method 1 and 4. The other two, or a combination there of, have very limited usage but can resolve tricky problems. Note also that for methods 1 and 4 the molding is oriented with the lower heel flat against the vertical wall. |
|---|
| To top of the page |
|---|
Method 1. Use of a transition piece(s).
|
|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|---|
First notice that the horizontal piece, Part H, has its top heel trimmed in order to eliminate the gap at the ceiling. Now consider the strange triangle piece. If you were to simply butt the two long pieces together in the corner, part S would have its lower heel below that of part H. To take care of this mismatch, Method 1 uses the transition piece. To the left we have a standard inside corner where Part H and the transition piece meet. It a regular Type A-1 joint. See Part 1 Crown on Horizontal Ceilings. For edge 2 we have a type B-5 (or A-2) joint. It is as if the molding is turning upwards. The cut is a function of the vault angle q, the spring angle g, and the wall angle b. Put all three of these values into the spreadsheet Excel Spreadsheets for Calculating Angles) and it will give the miter and bevel angles for cutting the crown lying flat on the miter saw table. Notice the offset, F, in the sketch above. It marks the point where the slanted part stops and it determines where to make the wall measurement. The spreadsheet will provide the value for F, or you could make a mark after cutting the transition piece and holding the parts in place. This method can be used for vault angles ranging from 0 (a flat ceiling) up to about 45 degrees. The reason for this limitation is that the horizontal molding needs something to bear against at the top. If the angle becomes too steep there will be a large gap at the top. In the sample shown, I removed part of the top edge so it lies against the sloping ceiling. This can be done with a block plane, a band saw, or if you have it available, a jointer. Keep in mind that the calculations for edge 2 depend on this "removal" (it uses the normal profile of the crown as if it were installed on a flat ceiling). |
|---|
For example, this could be a beam or wall near the top of the ceiling. It is a type B-2 intersection as shown in previously. The triangular transition piece looks similar and serves the same purpose as in case 1. However, the top heel need not be removed. Note that edge 2 makes a "vertical" turn, with the turn angle b = 180 –q |
|---|
![]() |
|---|
Notice, from the sketch below, that in order for the bottom heels to line up, the slanted crown has to be lowered. This creates a gap at the top that has to be filled. For steep vault angles this can amount to as much as ½ inch; more than you would want to fill with caulk. A wooden shim can be used for short segments. To calculate the filler thickness, you have to provide the width of the top heel for the molding you are using. |
|---|
![]() |
|---|
The first transition would make a horizontal turn and the second an upward
turn to connect the heels. Technically there is no way to do this in one step
with the same molding shape. |
|---|
![]() |
|---|
You might say that this small gap is not worth fooling with and that the molding (Part S) can easily be bent to meet edge 2. The caulking would take care of the mismatch. I would heartily agree in most cases. But the idea of using two pieces can be used when a real problem arises. In particular it leads me into the general situation that: When two sections of crown molding meet from two different directions and with different profiles, two transitions need to be made. The following case demonstrates how two transition pieces can solve an outside corner for vaulted ceilings. Again, I would not recommend this! It is difficult and does not really look attractive. But it makes the point that transition pieces can technically have a place. |
|---|
This is a type B-2 intersection, such as a turn around a columnor a jog in the wall. |
|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|---|
![]() |
|---|
| To top of the page |
|---|
Method 2. Using molding of two different sizes. All others would be for very steep angles. You will find this to be a very versatile technique for types B-1, B-3, C-1 and C-2 intersections. The sample shown to the right was made with two pieces that had widths of 3.63 and 4.25 inches. This would calculate out to be for a vault angle of 31 degrees. My model had a 30º angle. Close enough! |
|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|---|
Because the two parts have different dimensions, they have to be treated
individually. The wall angle is still 90º, so the horizontal piece has the
standard A-1 cut. The slanted piece, however, should not be cut the same way. It
is a compound angle cut and is similar to the rafter example I cover in Part
5 Compound Angle Cutting, except now the "rafter" (or slanted
crown) comes from above. It is an inside corner with r = 90º. The angle b has to be
calculated in order to get the miter angle M and
bevel setting B. The spreadsheet does this for
you. Notice that there are numerous cases with different calculations depending
on what type of intersection you are dealing with. Caulking will be necessary because the shapes are inherently different. But this is not too bad if the right combination of angles happen to fit your vault angle. Even a few degrees difference will not be noticeable. When the angle is off by more than 5 degrees you could still consider this method if you combine it with Method 3: Tilting the crown. |
|---|
| To top of the page |
|---|
Method 3. Tilting the Crown Along the Vertical Wall: |
|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|---|
The intersection of the slanted part and sloping piece is a very complex matter. It involves how high the horizontal part is against the ceiling (a function of q), how much the part is tilted (a function of the crown dimensions) and the angle b. I have not provided a thorough analysis of this. When you combine this with Method 2, make some samples and experiment to find the best cutting angles. The spreadsheet provides a few empirical solutions and some suggestions. But here trial and error will dominate. The sample in the photograph above was made by coping the horizontal piece. Because of its awkward slant and intersection, I would consider this to be more of a last resort or a way to solve a particularly tricky problem, rather than a "Method". When used by itself, it would be limited to short sections and small vault angles. It would not be my first choice unless, again, it is used in combination with Method 2. |
|---|
| To top of the page |
|---|
Method 4. Modify the corner with a block or other means to avoid the crown parts from intersecting: When the intersection is complicated or none of the above methods seem appropriate, consider adding a block or some decorative piece to the corner. Don’t fight the misalignment and angles; have the parts mate with something that is easier to deal with. Will you be adding columns, cornices and other decorative designs? If so, try to insert a stop to the crown molding and have it continue on the other side. Here is one example. A 4x4 block, mitered to angle q, is nailed into the corner. Now the molding can be cut straight across for the horizontal run. The vaulted piece is cut like a type B-5 or A-2; the crown looks like it is turning upwards. A more decorative approach is to add a couple of pieces of the same crown molding to the bottom of the block, as shown below. |
|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|---|
An outside corner is a real challenge. Even adding a block can become a bit more involved. I show one example for a right angle turn. Instead of having a very wide block, I took a piece of 4x4 and turned it 45 degrees. Now it faces into the room at an angle. This looks more balanced but requires some extra cutting. The drawing shows that the back was bevel cut on my table saw to provide clearance for the wall. I had to do some extra chiseling to make it fit just right. In addition, the surface that is against the ceiling is now a compound angle cut! Again, see the spreadsheet for calculating the miter and bevel settings for the saw. Some smaller crown pieces were added to the bottom and here is the result: |
|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|---|
Now, the straight or horizontal molding has a simple A-1 intersection with b = 135º. The slanted piece, however, is more complicated since it now meets the
block at two different angles. Because of these complicated intersections it is again advisable to see how the corners can be modified in other ways. Adding a column or cornice can often help to make the overall design look a lot smoother and attractive. |
|---|
| To top of the page |
|---|
Disclaimer: The information in this document has been provided to you free of charge and for your consideration only. The author has prepared the information in good faith and believes it to be correct and helpful. However, he takes no responsibility for anyone misusing the data, spreadsheets, suggestions or any other information contained herein. The reader is advised to take every precaution and apply all safety steps recommended by the manufacturer for the use of saws and other tools referenced herein. Author: Jacob Brentjes, December 2005
|
|---|